Hamburgers!

Late night conversations are wonderful, even if it does mean you only get 5 hours of sleep for the next day... So we were having one of those last night with my argumentative roommates, and one of the more substantial conversations was wether one can know that something tastes good. As Jon has taken this to the blogs and requested a reply, I feel the need to respond. This seems, however, to me a very inefficient method of having an argument...

One can have the sensation of good taste when eating a particular food. And, being a realist, I believe that this taste is also attached to that actual, real food. However, I do not believe that this is actually knowledge. Knowledge, philisophically speaking, is justified true belief (well, that is actually debated, but we will work from that for now). How can one be justified that a food tastes good? The idea of taste seems to be particularly subjective. In order to have knowledge of a thing, it must be something that is true. Therefore, unless the taste of the food is objectively good, one can only have knowledge that one thinks a food tastes good to him. This is different from saying that a food tastes good. In order to make this claim, the person must have access to compare the taste to an objective standard. Unless taste then can be connected to something objective, (the only standard that comes to mind is beauty), we cannot know that a food tastes good. As per our discussion last night, beauty does not seem to apply to particular one-dimensional senses...To say a food tastes beautiful, or something smells beautiful, or something feels beautiful (feeling meaning using the sense of touch), does not seem to be a proper use of that term. Perhaps that is because beauty is at least partially an intellectual thing, and since these senses do not partake in the realm of ideas, they cannot be beautiful...Now, for a blind person, does touch take on beauty? This I don't know...

Anyway, perhaps that seems a bit picky, but I think it is an important distinction. One can know that a food tastes good to you. One cannot know that a food tastes good. A person is not evil if he does not like the taste of chocolate, for instance. ;-)

Oh, and this conversation started with the hypotheses that a person says McDonalds hamburgers are better than Burger King's burgers. Some times it doesn't take much, eh? ;-)

G'night

Happy 2005!

Um, so it's a new year...well, not really, since it's like February, but I thought since my last post was about Christmas, I really should say something about the new year.

School has started with a vengence. Four more months. Now that the end is in sight, I am ready to be there.

I just finished a book on Quantum Computing. It is a fascinating field that offers lots of promise and lots of questions, very few of which are answered. Perhaps that is part of what draws me to that field. It is an area where relatively little progress has been made. Of course, it has had some of the most brilliant minds in Physics working on it, so I am not sure what good I could do, but I think I would like to at least understand more of the field. The last chapter of the book was full of bizzare and far fetched theories on multiverses and universal computation. I am amazed on one hand at the brilliancy of some of these theories, and yet, I am also amazed at how little they grasp because of a poor worldview and a total rejection of God. People would prefer to believe that the world was created from a quantum element than God... Ockham's razor seems like it should take affect sometime around here... ;-) I hope that I can come to a fuller understanding of Quantum mechanics so that I can understand our world better, our culture better, and our relationship towards God better, and perhaps I can make some useful contribution to the area at the same time. ;-) We shall see...

Anyway, this is an attempt to restart this dead piece of cyber-flesh. Perhaps if I posted something that didn't reference quantum in it, it might get read... Good night my friends!